LAMP is an awesome method for on-site PCR, but (speaking as someone who
*hasn't* tried it) seems to be harder to optimise and design for
general-purpose DNA amplification.
That is, standard PCR is better for prototyping a reaction, but for
creating a protocol for general or regular use, LAMP is probably a good
next step; as you point out, it requires little in the way of
instrumentation, and because there's no cycling of temperature, that's a
huge source of experimental error removed! Awesome for walk-by workshops
for DNA testing etc..
On 02/07/12 10:59, Marc Dusseiller wrote:
> hei garage biologists,
>
> just saw some interesting low-cost stuff at a conference in kenya. you know
> about LAMP? seems like a great and cheap alternative to pcr, especially on
> the instrumentation side.
>
> http://www.plosntds.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0000147
>
> more stuff from low-cost diagnostics soon,
> marc
>
--
www.indiebiotech.com
twitter.com/onetruecathal
joindiaspora.com/u/cathalgarvey
PGP Public Key: http://bit.ly/CathalGKey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
Re: [DIYbio] check LAMP! pcr is soooooo 90ies..
6:22 AM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment