Yes!
I see no reason an OSHW definition can't be at least as recognized as the DFSG.
However, the motivation for hardware designers to be OSHW-compliant
can be increased if the OSHW definition acts as a gateway to something
(as the DFSG determines eligibility for debian package inclusion). I
favor that something being an OSHW "distribution" of sorts -- what a
nice way to replace Thingiverse! But it could take the form of
something else entirely.
I'm willing to throw time, programming, and activism at this problem
if we can collect a few additional hands.
Thoughts?
--tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [DIYbio] Fwd: The institutionalization of OSHW
12:53 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment