-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=XYTG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Agreed. Also, define "wrong hands". Pop quiz; the entities with the
largest stockpiles of advanced biological warfare agents are: ____
(Hint: Not civilians, and not imaginary terrorists)
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:59:25 +0100
Brian Degger <brian.degger@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its more likely that it stops the knowledge getting into the right
> hands. On 11 Oct 2013 15:53, "Marn" <m.lederoff@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> It is bad to censore, but in that case it was about dangerous
> bacteria. So I guess it is acceptable. I wouldn't want those
> informations in the wrong hands.
>
> Am Freitag, 27. September 2013 07:07:26 UTC schrieb Pieter:
>
> > http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/**news-perspective/2013/09/**
> > dutch-court-affirms-limit-**publishing-h5n1-findings<http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2013/09/dutch-court-affirms-limit-publishing-h5n1-findings>
> >
> > A Dutch court had ruled that future research, similar tot
> > Fouchier's H5N1 work, will neef an export permit before publishing.
> >
> > This entire case is developing in such a wierde direction. Who else
> > is keeping an eye on the effect of last years NSABB report?
> >
> > http://news.sciencemag.org/**people-events/2012/03/**
> > breaking-news-nsabb-reverses-**position-flu-papers<http://news.sciencemag.org/people-events/2012/03/breaking-news-nsabb-reverses-position-flu-papers>
> >
> > It concluded that the publication should nog be blocked. However,
> > the recommendations weer the exact oppositie: censorship of science
> > and restricted access to scientific information (in other word: the
> > use of sciencetific knowledge as an political instrument).
> >
> > Is anyone witnessing the same development in other countries than
> > Holland? This ruling could have devastating effects on the Dutch
> > virology field of research
> >
> > --
> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to
> diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this
> group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
> Learn more at www.diybio.org
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "DIYbio" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/b59ddb0f-7c3a-4d48-817a-a0e10cfbe6fa%40googlegroups.com
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
Re: [DIYbio] Re: censoring science
6:22 AM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment