Re: [DIYbio] Re: Which microscope?

If you have a choice go with a higher numerical aperture rather than a
higher magnification. High mag doesn't get you any extra information,
it just makes the image appear larger. If you have high magnification
and low NA you'll just end up with a really large, blurry image.

In addition to Simon's advice that scopes without condensers are toys,
I would add that if the scope comes with an objective and they don't
specify* the NA of the objective, just the magnification, it's
_probably_ a toy. If they don't tell you the NA, it's probably
ridiculously low. The manufacturers of toy microscopes like to
advertise stupidly large magnifications, which doesn't tell you
anything about how small it will resolve.

* Sometimes the NA is specified in parentheses next to the
magnification. 60x (0.9) would mean 60 times magnification with a
numerical aperture of 0.9.


-cory

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment