[DIYbio] Re: DIYbio and Bioethics {entering soft-science}

I think as far as prenatal genetic testing, he is referring to the T13/T18/T21 trisomy tests from Sequenom, Verinata, etc.  The idea is to test for genetic abnormalities early on so you can abort the baby within a safe range.  Prenatal testing is going to expand into into other tests (CF etc.) in order to guarantee the parents a non-defective baby.

I think "prescribed" is the wrong word to use.

On Saturday, 31 March 2012 06:21:41 UTC-7, phillyj wrote:
I was wondering if anyone is a hobbyist philosopher(or related, not
sure the name) who is studying Bioethics (the whole field rather than
DIYbio only). Why should DIYbio be confined to "hard" science like
labwork or in-silico? Is anyone, as a hobby, thinking and writing on
morals and ethics in biology and other science fields?

***Sorry if my words are not well-chosen, e.g. "soft-science",
"confined", etc. I hope my point is understandable.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/diybio/-/pNWWk1P7wTUJ.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment