-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=1I+6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
There can be *no* guarantees in biology, of anything.
However, adding two amino acids to the N-terminus of your protein is
unlikely to destroy everything.
Do bear in mind; if the methionine will be excised from the protein,
which itself depends heavily on the second amino, then the second amino
will be the N-terminus of your protein; and the N-terminal amino has a
strong-ish impact on the long-term stability of the protein, with some
aminos (like Valine) being highly stable and others being highly
unstable.
I can't recall offhand but I think likelihood-of-M-excision is higher
if the first few aminos are..simple unbranched/uncharged? Someone else
wanna back me up or correct me here? So Glycine might encourage
methionine processing, and Glycine is probably unstable-ish.
As usual then, the answer is "probably not a big deal but there's all
this random stuff that might go wrong and in the end it might explode
or work amazingly".
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 07:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
"Mega [Andreas Stuermer]" <masterstorm123@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> For expression of a protein I would need to make it fit to the RBS of
> the vector.
>
> Is it ok, if I attach ATG-GGC (Methionine and Glycine) to the
> N-Terminus?
>
> So the fusion protein would be Met-Gly-Met-rest of Protein
>
> Is there a guarantee that the protein still works then?
>
> Best,
> Andreas
>
Re: [DIYbio] Expression Problem - fusion protein
12:10 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment