[DIYbio] Re: [CCL] Re: [biocurious] Re: lab-on-a-chip

Hi Thomas - thanks for stopping by! Looks like you've already been given a "warm" welcome ;-)

Personally, I have no beef with the transilluminator and other gear you're selling on your website. I don't think they're priced correctly and I definitely wouldn't recommend them to anyone at that price, but that's no skin off my nose. And it's not as if the Pearl Biotech guys invented the blue LED + amber filter approach. By the way, check out IORodeo's $100 transilluminator kit, or the $200 Gel Integrated System by Avery at BOSSlab, which includes power supply, illumination, and casting system all in a single box!

I definitely have to give you credit for putting together a nicely polished product. But yeah, your pricing (and engineering for affordability) still leaves a lot to be desired. Definitely check out the DIYbio mailing list - there's lots of people who are developing similar pieces of lab equipment and have already solved a lot of those cost concerns.

Patrik


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM, hbergeronx <hbergeronx@gmail.com> wrote:
Nathan:
 
 
The concept for the two transilluminators seems identical: blue illumination from LEDs, orange filter... I am mystified why someone would start a business with a more expensive product than an existing company founded a few years earlier by (afaik) a board member of BioCurious with more or less the same design. It doesn't seem like good advice for a startup. It calls serious question whether or not the people involved have the knowhow to produce a lab on a chip, let alone promise to donate them to "the third world" as a reqard for giving them money. It seems EPICALLY racially insensitive to start a company for a white person to start a company with a sales pitch capitalizing on the suffering of non-whites. 
 
-matt

On Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:16:40 PM UTC-8, Nathan McCorkle wrote:
Matt, see my comments in-line below.
Maybe.

If he didn't ask to use the BioCurious logo, or if Patrik doesn't
consent to being in this film, then that's certainly an issue.

And it'd be hard to rip-off transillumination as a general idea, as
any qPCR type reaction (or nucleic acid quantification in general)
will have illumination /trans/ (across) the sample to a detector
(whether camera or your eyes). It definitely doesn't look like
anything Pearl Biotech has done, at least on their home page.

> -matt


--
-Nathan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Counter Culture Labs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to counterculturelabs+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CAKOjizMQ0yakG-vmBeaCBAVRkJh%2Bx4ADL-eZB9oOhmOfjeUu-g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment