On 02/01/2015 06:16 PM, Nathan McCorkle wrote:
> Pixy
> CMUCam5, which also has Python interfaces... from looking at both this
> and openMV I'd tend to say the Pixy might be more 'bang for your buck'
There's a big ease of coding and debugging difference in "has python interface"
and "has python command line" while running python internally.
The price of the module is not the BOM cost either. BOM cost of micropython
based on the ARM STM32 mcu is very good.
But... if you want nice micro-photographs right away, I am sure Simon's
recommendations of FOSS on Canon digicams is the way to go.
For machine vision based on python running on a $6 mcu, the
particular image sensor chip is not even the main thing. If OpenMV Cam's chip is
not perfect, a follow on will be closer to perfection since the inexpensive mcu hdwe + FOSS
machine vision code makes a huge value, and the image sensors to go with it can evolve better
over time.
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/54CEEFC6.8020600%40industromatic.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [DIYbio] $50 camera good for microscopy with machine vision code included
7:32 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment