On 05/06/2015 11:16 AM, Jeswin wrote:
> you might have to figure out
> how to quench the emission signal before the next collection point.
Not if you go slower than. He's thinking up another way, not how to
"be like" the current industry standard.
Slow, cheap and automated running a queue of samples could be very useful.
By slow, I am thinking of phosphors as used in analog oscilloscopes That put out light for
many milliseconds after a microseconds pulse of input light. Not minutes, not nanoseconds either.
Phosphors that put out for 10 seconds would be quite useful in an automated queue...
and if doing PCR, under the cycle time. Faster than the cycle time is not more useful.
Finding a phosphor that is compatible with and sticks to DNA is where to do some thinking and researching
if you want to figure out a "Phosphorescent PCR dye" method.
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/554A595C.3070407%40industromatic.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [DIYbio] Re: Phosphorescent PCR dye
11:11 AM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment