On 06/17/2015 03:48 PM, Levi Morris wrote:
> as far as just documenting the history of a particular sequence,
> I'm kind of shocked that git isn't already being used for this. That
> parts.igem.org is page is a pretty painful user experience and their
> API doesn't look much better (XML?!?!?). It would be nice to be able
> to clone a git repo of all that data and manipulate it as I see fit
> (but man, XML?!?)
WE have anti-XML rant discussions on a list about electronics tools development too.
It's sooo bloaty! DNA has redundancy and repetition for protection, but XML has it "just for fun".
There seems to be an anti-coder bias in bio.
John
(not a coder -- yet...I do hardware, and some of that requires code -- scripts not apps.)
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/558215CB.8040008%40industromatic.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [DIYbio] Re: I'm curious, why don't we post open source sequences more often?
5:50 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment