http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4161972/
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 11:31:42 AM UTC-8, flight505 wrote:
-- On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 11:31:42 AM UTC-8, flight505 wrote:
hi Koeng,Do you have any articles explaining the mentioned spacers between ribozymes?thanks
Den lørdag den 21. november 2015 kl. 07.41.41 UTC-8 skrev Koeng:Yes, multiplexed spacers work. The bigger reason was to get a good RNA on the 5' end which would fold stably so the sgRNA wouldn't degrade. Then there was also the idea of how you could just plop that onto one another and you get a nicely trimmed RNA transcript. The ribozyme only works on it's 5' endOriginal transcriptHDV-sgRNA_1-HDV-sgRNA_2-HDV-sgRNA_3-HDV Processed transcriptHDV-sgRNA_1HDV-sgRNA_2HDV-sgRNA_3From personal observation, it seems like it's easier to just clone them separately then goldengate them together (separate promoters and stuff). If you want to multiplex it, you'll probably just synthesize that construct^ (poor synthesis company)-Koeng
On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 4:21:51 PM UTC-8, flight505 wrote:@ Koeng sounds very interesting can you elaborate a bit? do you mean you trim the RNA transcript on both 5´ and 3´ ends with HDV? how as trans-acting ? and multiplexed HDV-RNA-HDV-spacer-HDV-RNA-HDV ?Best regerds,
Den fredag den 20. november 2015 kl. 23.10.47 UTC+1 skrev Koeng:This works in yeast, except we use HDV instead of hammerhead. Same idea. I haven't tried it myself, however.
On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 12:09:43 PM UTC-7, Mega [Andreas Stuermer] wrote:Hi everyone,
Just came across something awesome I wanted to share.
Hammerhead ribozymes were actually successfully tried to produce multiple crispr-guide RNAs (the problem with normal mRNAs is that they are exported from the nucleus into the cytosol, but the crispr/cas9 enzyme and the DNA are in the nucleus).
Here's one paper
"Self‐processing of ribozyme‐flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR‐mediated genome editing", from which I take the graphic.
Here one example how it was done:
Promoter (CMV)
tagttattaatagtaatcaattacggggtcattagttcatagcccatatatggagttccg cgttacataacttacggtaaatggcccgcc tggctgaccgcccaacgacccccgcccatt gacgtcaataatgacgtatgttcccatagt aacgccaatagggactttccattgacgtca atgggtggagtatttacggtaaactgccca cttggcagtacatcaagtgtatcatatgcc aagtacgccccctattgacgtcaatgacgg taaatggcccgcctggcattatgcccagta catgaccttatgggactttcctacttggca gtacatctacgtattagtcatcgctattac catggtgatgcggttttggcagtacatcaa tgggcgtggatagcggtttgactcacgggg atttccaagtctccaccccattgacgtcaa tgggagtttgttttggcaccaaaatcaacg ggactttccaaaatgtcgtaacaactccgc cccattgacgcaaatgggcggtaggcgtgt acggtgggaggtctatataagcagagctgg tttatgaaccgtcagatcc
UTR/RE
gagctc
homolgy site
cgacta
5' Hammerhead Ribozyme (cuts at it's 3' end)
ctgatgagtccgtgaggacgaaacgagtaagctcgtc
targeting gene sequence
tagtcgcgtgtagcgaagca
gRNA scaffold
gttttagagctagaaatagcaagttaaaataaggctagtccgttatcaacttgaaaaagt ggcaccgagtcggtgc
whatever (important spacer?)
tttt
3' HDV ribozyme (cuts at the 5' of the ribozyme)
ggccggcatggtcccagcctcctcgctggcgccggctgggcaacatgcttcggcatggcg aatgggac
UTR (from cloning)
cccgggatgctagctaa
polyA
gcgggactctggggttcgaaatgaccgaccaagcgacgcccaacctgccatcacgagatt tcgattccaccgccgccttctatgaaaggt tgggcttcggaatcgttttccgggacgccg gctggatgatcctccagcgcggggatctca tgctggagttcttcgcccaccctaggggga ggctaactgaaacacggaaggagacaatac cggaaggaacccgcgctatgacggcaataa aaagacagaataaaacgcacggtgttgggt cgtttgttcataaacgcggggttcggtccc agggctggcactctgtcgataccccaccga gacgccattggggccaatacgcccgcgttt cttccttttccccaccccaccccccaagtt cgggtgaaggcccagggctcgcagccaacg tcggggcggcaggccctgccatagcctcag
It will be probably a pain for synthesis companies to synthesize, but can save you a lot of (sub)cloning pain and costs are probably similar to getting PCR reagents and primers and stuff. If PCR doesn't even cost more.
You can thus add multiple gRNAs in one big RNA, from one promoter. Like
Promoter--(HH)-gRNA1-(HDV) --spacer--(HH)-gRNA1-(HDV) --spacer--(HH)-gRNA1-(HDV) --spacer--(HH)-gRNA1-(HDV) --spacer-- polyA
Good spacers would probably be like this
ATACTATCAATACTTATCCATCATA
ATTACTTAACCATAATATCTTAACCAT
High in AT - so no interference with ribozymes. Some Cs in it,synthesis companies have local GC content lower limits
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/3c9005a4-fc81-4eb8-92f4-569bdc17048e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment