Ok, fair points. I'd direct criticism at the root problem, in that case: if "mycelium" is too nonspecific then it needs to be more specific, rather than cheaper but still vague. :)
On 29 April 2016 09:27:52 IST, Nathan McCorkle <nmz787@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Cathal (Phone)
<cathalgarvey@cathalgarvey.me> wrote:Don't do that, please. People devaluing one another's work to the
lowest-common-denominator is the kind of peer anti-support that keeps
everyone labouring in obscurity.
Leaving asode the fact that a brick-and-mortar biohacking shop is costly
(but it apparently exists!), there are significant advantages to buying a
strain for the paltry cost of €30: strain identity can be known, sterility
and purity guaranteed, and you're standardised with everyone else who bought
that product and can avail of a community for support.
I recall getting this crap when I was planning to sell an open source
plasmid *customised for DIYbio* for around €45: cheaper than pUC18 at most
vendors, but I distinctly remembering someone accusing me of profiteering
for not selling at $1. As if years of work designing and testing had nothing
to do with making the thing and only the costs of fermentation mattered. I
was even threatened that I'd be deliberately undercut and pushed out of
business.
I recognize a significant difference between the IndieBB plasmid and
"mycelium". It does not have any strain listed, and if someone really
wants "mycelium" they can get it for 100X cheaper, from common sources
including most rotting lignocellulosic material (unlike custom
synthetic engineered DNA) or for a GRAS option, a grocery store. I
didn't criticize the labelled strains they had which were apparently
collected to achieve a wide-ranging color palette from a single
vendor.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment