Question to Sean Sullivan, possibly but really a general question
Anytime the question is asked ? "How often does this succeed ?" The usual answer starts with a long observation; ex: "It depends ...". Ok
Recall from a strict numerical method approach, if success or failure criterea can be decided upon per act, and acts batched into some kind, there is always a number in the noise, and an important one. What is the line item success rate, as usually composed ?
Sure some if;s in the question ! Situation:
*) Gene BP count is 3K NT, promotor tails, introns if any etc well known to work.
*) Expression system known, like locally managed Yeast or 'whatever'
*) Selection itself is reliable, UV florescence or some other property
Q1) How many labor hours is typical, no paperwork time, just wet lab including end game verification ?
Q2) Whats the success rate of a new germ line in percent ?
Q3) How often is a success rate wrong ultimately. not that the Gene did do what is expected, but some 'other' flaw made it not really get expressed ?
Q4) Is sequencing the believed usable final modified colony invariably reliable enough to make Q3 irrelevant ?
Thanks in advance of anyone who answers. As people like me want to make this technology, not science, this is a big thing hugely.
is Q2) Closer to what ? 30% 80 %
For Q1) I mean hands on time with endless revisits to the plates and so on, not includng incubation times, centerfuge, etc.
Thanks!
Recall from a strict numerical method approach, if success or failure criterea can be decided upon per act, and acts batched into some kind, there is always a number in the noise, and an important one. What is the line item success rate, as usually composed ?
Sure some if;s in the question ! Situation:
*) Gene BP count is 3K NT, promotor tails, introns if any etc well known to work.
*) Expression system known, like locally managed Yeast or 'whatever'
*) Selection itself is reliable, UV florescence or some other property
Q1) How many labor hours is typical, no paperwork time, just wet lab including end game verification ?
Q2) Whats the success rate of a new germ line in percent ?
Q3) How often is a success rate wrong ultimately. not that the Gene did do what is expected, but some 'other' flaw made it not really get expressed ?
Q4) Is sequencing the believed usable final modified colony invariably reliable enough to make Q3 irrelevant ?
Thanks in advance of anyone who answers. As people like me want to make this technology, not science, this is a big thing hugely.
is Q2) Closer to what ? 30% 80 %
For Q1) I mean hands on time with endless revisits to the plates and so on, not includng incubation times, centerfuge, etc.
Thanks!
Daniel B Kolis
my ref: nafl, 30 Aug 2022, diybio
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/8e850a8c-4c53-4124-b60c-5c1bf9f6be6en%40googlegroups.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment