Re: [DIYbio] TECAN Evo Clinical - DiTi not properly mounted on LiHa

Any thing packed with menus and a 490 page PDF writes a fat file someplace on XYZ attempts, which transducer doesn't like a thing.. Here's the manual and an extract hinting at a log file ( for example ):

https://www.tecan.com/hubfs/394802_en_V2_3%20Application%20Software%20Manual%20Fdm%20EVOlution-1.pdf

16.5.6 Log Files The log file contains information on configuration changes and other data which have been created, edited or saved. It documents pipetting and records user actions and changes to parameter values, etc. The log files are written to a specified directory (default location \Program Files\Common Files\Tecan\Logging\...)

Maybe try there as a start. poke around and find the file that changes everytime it does anything, etc. Horribly, this thing uses a MS operating system ( shudder ). But the above anyway gets you a spot in the DIR system to look, almost for sure.... the HHMMSS time stamp is the magic juice to focus your attention(s). Everybody assumes its just a Z position, well, who knows what they have dreampt up in that thing. Esp ! if it works at one end of the table and repeats this elsewhere in XY, now what. Understanding the thing is required and its a horror show when you don't have source code.

Obviously you can just carefully iterate the programmable positions you have, but a peek at the files is maybe fewer hours of tedious work. Even if/when you make it "go" the problem is nearly certain to reoccur, you cannot find the underlying logic completely via iteration without truly incredible amounts of experimentation.

Also, knowing file names by location and name is a huge leg up when talking to the phone help people. Instead of wishing you away with a click to their program, if you mumble out a specific filename, you might get 90 seconds more help before then click "Resolved" on their tracking program.

Motion control problems are usually moderately hard to really resolve. Even when you think its fixed, you usually wrong and it re- occurs sometimes. So what, keep notes and modify everything in truly "baby steps". ex: use the original tips and see if it fails with the new Cartesian settings, make a mixed system with lots of test moves and sub in the new tips one by one, etc.

and look for the file(s) !

You cannot trust even what appears to be success, anyway. There are too many things contingent on that thing to trust what appears to be a few try success. Maybe a highly specific test situation of a few tubes in a difficult to achieve 100 steps would be worth creating as a lab control, with or without this cheaper/different tip thing problem. Tap water will do, tap water with food colouring is maybe better. Most failures like this are total, not proportional, but that would show up hopefully in a last pass qualifying step you should elucidate and execute anyway. A really interesting qualifying step migth combine pH and color and give you a baseline five tubes with a ultra accurate mixed result either a colorimitter or pH tool could measure !

Finding the singular best file it makes with the most detail is surely a happy moment. If the experimenters make careful run records, tell them to make there batch files for file saving copy out that file buried in all the Microsoft noise....

Good luck, you will resolve it; ( First time, second time, etc ) but you will get the dragon slayed with effort.

Regards,
Daniel B. Kolis