-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
My understanding of why that approach never got traction is that there
is *no* way for you to guarantee your customers or creators of
derivative works that you won't change your mind and sue everyone in a
month or two.
Why that problem doesn't appear wit hconventional copyright, I don't know.
On 02/27/2013 07:04 PM, John Griessen wrote:
> On 02/27/2013 12:35 PM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
>> the unfortunate reality is that without a default protection such
>> as Copyright, many will choose to enforce Patents upon their
>> work, ruining the possibility of a healthy commons even further.
>
> Unless you patent it and then license it open for free use. That's
> what it will likely take to free publish any hardware that
> actually makes much value to the mainstream buyers, as I take it
> from the lawyers. The worldwide legal structures are about
> money==property assessments and licenses and contracts on that. So,
> ownership by patent is the only path that fits in the current
> legal structure AFAICT... Maybe we should ask this of Ackerman,
> the lawyer who wrote the TAPR license...
>
- --
Please note my new email: cathalgarvey@cathalgarvey.me
PGP Key: 988B9099
Bitmessage: BM-opSmZfNZHSzGDwdD5KzTnuKbzevSEDNXL
Twitter: @onetruecathal
Code: https://gitorious.org/~cathalgarvey
Blog: http://www.indiebiotech.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRLmFDAAoJEL0iNgSYi5CZiI4P/iY4mxr+WigL5LjsAHE30R7J
4uiTTeazccvhVFN2o/6jmR2FJnETiEUGZdqs/V5a1X2HFIfP3IKQWdw5dwXVWDRW
z1wWhYr5LZjRdo5hPED8PsxamsUDFP72RCDUd1q5Gl2avPlYUD1Kadme7Iq1GFjs
23t8WMwulxby7CR9kxqMxYPpP4fz9RWcrQBMrCqe5Pjb0qUxR1aPUEXhhjeC+oDg
LoXZzmEDs9Kmc+Qdv4mrDNNhx9Vy2EUMmduFqoXdJXwjWelJNVIHP324i96WmdKm
OwIdEjSQdBM09rIU8r2k1Pd4Q0tk/L3eYd4OvNYVE5RjXyr1uP44z8WOFxMrKhiX
ExCTiWFdGrwpczEFp9IekXYcwXNF1BXeIxlNEq+O8jpwygQ2Ws6LhJET0Qysh7w8
bTogvfPrnqTlEZCBCY44FCyvo5aGYhbiz6fmKtfgDpNrJbU5z9FkKMzzbX9rLdE7
pEmMDq+NyFztMT6up1bYjWG89XEHXzHHBbzzgYh8f5fw8KEEBoKSCL2MCrWeZJle
SfdPotRqv+Xc9XIQ0D+5kNtu0dXm5NTOyZRilGwjKL5n7htmIEV+dQlfvglG/jrz
NBW9i9Kp7UE+8v7l02OhKdoGHCLh9WfXVET/jh2mJfkxhEjylqP7Obfi5abcGUy5
88HFHgBVEmhAmo1DSAvZ
=1pDO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [DIYbio] Fwd: 3D printing & intellectual property rights - So why are we bothering with GPL,CC etc licenses?
11:40 AM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment