Re: [DIYbio] civil disobedience and diybio

http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2013/05/civil-disobedience-and-diybio.php

From a point of view of materials and time it is not costly to set up a home
laboratory for the purposes of synthesizing chemical compounds or even
perform simple procedures in biotechnology - raising bacteria, assaying
genes in lower animals, and so on. It is, however, illegal to just forge
ahead and do this in most US states or in much of Europe due to the many
prosaic, stupid laws that encrust the body politic. Such laws hang around
for long after they stop serving whichever special interest wrote them and
bribed politicians to pass them. Then there are the cases of mass hysteria
that become written into law and continue onward for decades no matter how
much harm they cause, such as the drug war.

It is in fact the drug war, and not the normal background level
protectionism of licenses and zoning, that turns DIYbio, amateur chemistry
and other similar citizen science activities into an expensive and risky
endeavor. It should be cheap, but the cost is now all in the risk. The state
has shown great willingness to smash first and ask questions later, if at
all, and this leads to things like reagent providers only selling to
registered labs, requirements to register all glassware, and raids conducted
on people who followed all the rules - because the left hand doesn't care
what the right hand said, and local police departments make out like bandits
from confiscation and auction of assets belonging to those merely accused of
breaking laws. Where there are incentives, there will be those who follow
the incentives, and the incentives today are very much aligned with less
citizen science and more police accusation.

The present state of medical regulation is every bit as bad as the drug war,
and indeed very much influenced by it when it comes to thing like
painkillers. The massive body of law concerning medicine and life science
research accomplishes numerous iniquities beyond ensuring that people suffer
more pain at times when drugs could prevent that suffering: it slows
development; it makes therapies much more expensive; it eliminates whole
regions of development by making it too costly to attempt; it prohibits some
classes of therapy by fiat, such as those that aim to treat degenerative
aging; it makes it illegal for a dying person to make an educated decision
about trying an experimental therapy. And so forth.

At some point the massive wall of laws, all of the forbiddances telling
people that they cannot try to make their lives better, will run headlong
into the fact that it is becoming ever cheaper to synthesize drugs and the
basis for therapies in a home laboratory. All it takes is knowledge and the
willingness to undertake civil disobedience: to disregard a law because it
is evil and unjust. It has to be said that near every law that touches on
medicine in this day and age is evil and unjust, and the costs they impose
in their aggregate cause great pain, suffering, and death. What might have
been accomplished without the ball and chain of regulation is invisible,
however, and therefore easily waved away by those who claim that regulation
is necessary. Everyone takes the present state of affairs as the way things
are and looks little past it.

Unlike recreational drugs, it is clear that the costs and the benefits for
manufacturing your own medicine are not yet at the point of spurring people
to action at the level of small chemistry or biotech laboratories. The
knowledge is still too specialized, the complexity of the work too great,
and the benefits too narrow. This will change, however, and think it will
largely change on the benefit side of the equation. For example, consider
mitochondrially targeted antioxidants like SS-31 and SkQ compounds:
synthesizing them is an exercise in organic chemistry that is many steps in
sophistication above the bucket chemistry of a recreational drug laboratory,
but I have to imagine that there will be a market for these things once the
public starts to appreciate that they seem to have significant effects on
aging tissue. SS-31 produces endurance benefits in older mice when tested,
and that's probably a draw if it does the same for people. The athletics
community certainly includes an underground of experimental biochemistry,
one of the consequences of all the money floating around there.

Targeted antioxidants shown to reverse some aspects of aging and extend life
in mice are a trivial exercise in comparison to what is coming down the
line, however. It won't be too many years from now before researchers can
describe exactly how to repair and replace damaged mitochondria, construct
infused enzyme solutions that destroy specific metabolic waste products that
contribute to aging, and so forth. The future of medicine to treat aging and
extend life will consist of a whole range of precisely designed proteins
like the waste-product-chewing enzymes that can be manufactured in an
appropriately equipped biotech lab. The cost of materials will continue to
fall, the knowledge needed to perform the work will continue to disseminate,
and when the upside of civil disobedience is rejuvenation and more years of
healthy life then there will be a whole lot more civil disobedience.

In actual fact, think that the scenario of scofflaw medical manufacture will
happen along the way, long before SENS-like rejuvenation biotechnology is at
a point where portions of it could - in theory - be performed in a
sufficiently well equipped home laboratory. Something better than SS-31 will
emerge, or at least something better equipped to catch the public
imagination, and grey and black markets will bloom. I'm looking forward to
it: the present system of medical regulation is ugly, repressive, and costs
lives: the sooner it collapses in the face of ubiquitous disregard the
better.

Reason

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/000c01ce5b2b%24d5fc0db0%2481f42910%24%40org?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.