I think most University disposal of EtBr(at least in the US) is self-policing, which is great. The less of a potential hazardous substance in the world the better.
I just found this journal article, no joke, about an internet mailing list(newsgroup) discussion about EtBr disposal from 1994, no joke.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_R75gIJvkFUTTR6WDI0c1k2NVE/edit?usp=sharing
I am glad this issue has not been resolved since 1994 and no new arguments are being made, haha.
The whole "community standards" idea is interesting.
This next part is not meant to be about EtBr specifically
Who decides what should be a community standard? I assume someone would say "the community". Is there a vote? Do a few people just try and push what they think it should be?
In most mainstream Science there are only two things that are used to determine if something becomes akin to a "community standard".
1. Does it work.
2. Is it legal to work with.
To me Science is about doing Science. Maybe I am reckless. But deciding what chemical I think people should use for electrophoresis or as is apparent recently on this mailing list, what power supply people should use, seems bureaucratic. No one cares what chemical or power supply you are using if you are doing good Science.
No journal is going to say, "Well his Science is good but he used EtBr and a sketchy power supply and we don't want to promote that soooo we won't publish it."
I mean bureaucracy is why so many people I know want to leave mainstream Science and it seems to be rearing it's head here.
I hope we as a group are going to give people the most benefits in our doubts and do Scientific work and judge people's Scientific work instead of what and how they do it.
<snip>
> There is no disregard for MSDS. Search online. Ethidium Bromide
> disposal is not regulated by the EPA. Most states do not have
> regulations regarding it's disposal either.
It is regulated in some other *countries* though, meaning that even if
we all accept that it's not as dangerous as commonly thought, we're
better off suggesting alternative gel dye methods as "community
standards" that we can expect to be equally applicable to all. Those
with a need for higher gel resolution can upgrade to something more
effective later on.
> I am sure Ethidium Bromide is mutagenic if inhaled in high
> quantities or consumed in large quantities or placed it on the skin
> in high quantities. I have worked with Ethidium Bromide for ~10 years
> and I can't recall it ever even touching my skin... I wear gloves as
> when working with it as I assume most people wear gloves when doing
> lab work especially with potentially hazardous chemicals? Again, it
> would seem only logical that if Ethidium Bromide was so dangerous
> there would be an outbreak of cancer amongst professional Scientists
> but there is not...
We've actually had discussions intermittantly about the safety or lack
of regarding EtBr, and I've seen others off-list between
old-as-the-hills molecular biologists.
Also, there's this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethidium_bromide#Health_risks
It does appear that, while EtBr is highly mutagenic in the Ames test
when treated with liver homogenate, there's little evidence that it has
the same level of mutagenicity in humans under normal circumstances.
The studies mentioned in the Wikipedia article do not appear to study
teratogenicity, so the safest option would be to assume it is a mild
to moderate teratogen, given its very mixed reputation: avoid exposure
months before making babies (either gender) or while pregnant.
However, all that said, EtBr is still regulated in some countries, I
think. I don't know whether it was law or merely policy, but EtBr had
to be handled by a waste disposal specialist in Ireland in my local
University. We had special decanters with activated charcoal teabags to
collect post-gel EtBr waste, and the "teabags" were sent for disposal.
Given its reputation, difficulty in acquisition in some places, dubious
legal standing, and the fact that you need UV to image (even seconds of
UV transillumination slash transformation/cloning efficiency rates), I'm
still in favour of alternatives like Sybr-Safe.
-Cathal
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/diybio/uNiIyU4xsvA/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/20130705102259.5371d9c4%40Neptune.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CAEUkM4vqgsSn4jf7h7nJ2qDPM82dv22xy_FR9qgqhfzk%3DNe2XA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
0 comments:
Post a Comment