All sorts of "A.I." software implementations are incredibly useful: Period. But the acts extracted by human users benefits from being somewhat careful with doing so.
Being 'careful' is hard for the same reason autonomous vehicle hardware and software gone bad usually generates accidents. A failure rate in the low ones of percents ( ABS MAX ) is a tough go for human awareness.
Misuse of things, in the general case creates hardship. This is not an exclusive property of some sorts of fancy software !
Endless social enginner wanna be's want to inflict and endless parade of limitation on A.I. generally. As always, they yowl up some singular sad story of "this thing did a bad thing", not too interested in the 100:1 of utility generated.
Shame on you, you low output loving do-gooders.
So: YES ! Programs of all sorta including machine learning, AI etc will help you deliver things that are desirable, but on the way you have to be careful.
The problem is not the implementations, its the expectations leaning into A.I. problems as new-wave magic. Complaining, however has some utility to warn 'us all' to remember what we already know about adive and synopsis of all sorts form hmans. sometimes they look right, and aren't.
Regs to all,
Daniel B. Kolis ; 15 Apr 2026
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/4421489a-3f36-4832-ab77-80dc8d3236b9n%40googlegroups.com.





