-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=cTaO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Correct; not "Open Source", which implies there exists a closed source
base to open.
"Open Science" is a nebulous enough phrase, but at least it doesn't
make falsifiable claims (which makes it bad science! :P) to having a
"source" to speak of.
Now, there's plenty of room for discussion on the applicability of
"Open Source" to science that possesses a sort of source-base, such as
data-heavy research, but that still doesn't apply to or justify a
screed against a co-operative venture like Biocurious.
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:51:00 -0700
Jonathan Cline <jcline@ieee.org> wrote:
> "There are many interpretations of what open science means, with
> different motivations across different disciplines. Some are driven by
> the backlash against corporate-funded science, with its profit-driven
> research agenda. Others are internet radicals who take the
> "information wants to be free" slogan literally. Others want to make
> important discoveries more likely to happen."
> -- The Guardian, 'Open science: a future shaped by shared experience'
> http://www.theguardian.com/education/2011/may/22/open-science-shared-research-internet
>
>
> The original kickstarter for Biocurious was "produced by the Network
> for Open Scientific Innovation, a 501(c)3 non profit organization. Our
> mission is to gather all stakeholders who want to liberate our
> scientific and technological commons to enable an new era of
> decentralized, distributed innovation to solve humanity's greatest
> challenges."
> --
> http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/openscience/biocurious-a-hackerspace-for-biotech-the-community
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [DIYbio] Re: [biocurious] Important Update from Kristina
8:23 AM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment