On 01/21/2016 04:25 PM, Bryan Jones wrote:
> Myself and others in my academic research lab have used it regularly to do all kinds of experiments, including lots of
> site-directed mutagenesis, error-prone PCR, site-saturation mutagenesis, and to construct libraries using DNA-shuffling. I
> published some of my work last year citing OpenPCR (attached). I generally don't use our expensive mj research thermocycler at all
> anymore.
How do the two compare?
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/56A1A5B2.5020106%40industromatic.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [DIYbio] What's wrong with open source PCRs
7:44 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment