>I don't understand how scientists keep going along with regulations that always produce negative results and have never produced anything positive. You ought to consider it your >duty to point this out in no uncertain terms.
Then the only point for doing research is because you are passionate about it, and to get funding. Pretty pointless if the promising therapies never get allowed
>You have to consider what the end result of regulation is... you are forcibly robbing people of something they believe is appropriate and valuable to their health. That's not >hyperbole either. The end result is cops kicking your door in and robbing you of your medicine at gunpoint. People tend to forget that when they're on their soapbox talking about >helping protect people from themselves.
While it is true that the government shall protect its non biology educated people from harming themselves, a biologist may know the risk of a therapy and should have the choice to take it.
There should be a kind of driver's licence for medicine, by which you show enough knowledge to test therapies
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/4a9dc98b-b67a-4c06-a9cc-814084f12a10%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment