On 11/09/2016 07:28 AM, R. Trojok wrote:
> During the event it got obvious that there is a schizm between grassroots and top down citizen science.
> Martin Brocklehurst, Policy, Strategy, Governance and Partnerships for DITO for instance wants citizen science
> in a strict top down fashion, citizens as mere data providers to research institutes. unpaid, of course, doing the laborous work
> in the field.
Thanks for telling us about this trend. Maybe with reference to TV's Big Bang Theory sitcom, this clueless self important
behavior by the institutional stakeholder scientists can be pointed out to the regulators with the purse-strings of the 480M.
Regulators may be as clueless about official scientist attitudes as science content.
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/548aa0a4-740e-5d1c-5462-a9cbe393d7ba%40industromatic.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [DIYbio] ECSA stakeholder roundtable
11:03 AM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment