Bryan's suggestions contain most of the great information that's available under a free license, afaik- because of the implicit license, like wikipedia, one can import that data freely into a newer effort. That's why standards, technology, and license are crucial considerations. ;)
I think OWW requires moderator approval to join, which is effective against spam but makes participation hard. HPlus has always been a communal effort AFAIK, though you might need to use IRC to get involved beyond merely contributing content.
On 27 September 2017 15:47:38 GMT+01:00, Michael Flynn <mflynn210@gmail.com> wrote:
Multiple information sources is part of the problem. There needs to be a place for consensus. If wikipedia was spread out over 10 different sites it would be 1/10^6 as effective. I wish I had time to put this together.
On Monday, September 25, 2017 at 9:40:10 AM UTC-7, Bryan Bishop wrote:On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Michael Flynn <mfly...@gmail.com> wrote:One thing that's notably missing from this community is a centralized knowledge repository like a wiki.This wiki would contain things like a "ramp" of procedures, annotated with dollar costs, to take someone from 0 knowledge in bio to someone that could make contributions.Anyone else agree that this is missing? Perhaps we can make a kickstarter.
There's a few different wikis floating around already--
https://openwetware.org/wiki/Main_Page
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/diybio/faq/
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment