On 2/15/19 4:34 PM, Chris Santos-Lang wrote:
> Together these arguments imply that genetic engineering of our offspring may be important, but that any such process should be
> tested in smaller ecosystems (measuring the impact on the ecosystem, not just on the individual humans) before unleashing it globally.
>
There is no person or country with that level of control over people yet, and that's a good thing. Unleashing it globally is the
normal sexual reproduction way we are used to...
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/af16f428-4787-7bdb-f266-c8e96b83edbd%40industromatic.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [DIYbio] Re: Privately funded designer babies
6:27 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment