Hello Matt,
thank you for the article. That is very interesting that there is probably a connection with the immune system. I wonder why the blood clot incidents are mainly with the Astrazenica vaccine and not the m-RNA vaccines like Biontech/Pfizer and Moderna. At least I didn't hear anythin negative about the m-RNA vaccines.
Is it due to other ingredients in Astrazenica or the mechanism of action via the use of the vector virus?
In general, I am more sympathetic to the m-RNA vaccines than to the vector virus vaccines, because the vector virus vaccines manipulate the cell nucleus and carry DNA, it cannot be excluded that viral DNA fragments are integrated into the cell nucleus in my opinion. Any thoughts on that?
Is it due to other ingredients in Astrazenica or the mechanism of action via the use of the vector virus?
In general, I am more sympathetic to the m-RNA vaccines than to the vector virus vaccines, because the vector virus vaccines manipulate the cell nucleus and carry DNA, it cannot be excluded that viral DNA fragments are integrated into the cell nucleus in my opinion. Any thoughts on that?
matt.e...@gmail.com schrieb am Samstag, 3. April 2021 um 02:11:57 UTC+2:
Mike,Perhaps this article might reveal some effort on this front, and the names of those involved.MattOn Apr 2, 2021, at 7:18 PM, 'Mike Petersen' via DIYbio <diy...@googlegroups.com> wrote:Hello everyone, if you follow the current situation in Europe, you will notice what a mess it is with the Astrazenica vaccine. The cases of sinus vein thrombosis and fatal blood clots have caused it to be partially withdrawn and then reintroduced with restrictions.
There is great debate about not overstating the risk, but of course it is tragic for any individual to die from a fatal vaccine side effect.
Wouldn't it be much more scientific to investigate what factors came together in those affected and led to these effects. What do I gain by referring to the low probability that it could occur in me and relying only on statistics. Wouldn't it be much safer and more scientific to determine the individual risk based on biomarkers (blood values, genetic features, etc.). The question is whether information is available, for example, studies that show commonalities of those affected. Are any of you aware of anything on this?Thank you,Mike--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/e9efd345-c9ca-4314-8b49-cf8fff225275n%40googlegroups.com.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/cf5a271a-66a6-4569-8676-a1c89b6419c6n%40googlegroups.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment