Re: [DIYbio] Re: hydrolyzing chicken sternum collagen

They claim to have some double-blind, placebo-controlled studies backing up their claims (which are related to both join pain and anti-aging,) but both studies I've seen have an employee of the company that filed the patent listed among the authors.  And it's only two studies, so I'm extremely skeptical.

I'm mostly just curious whether I could do it at home.  I cook and eat a lot of chickens anyway so it'd be no problem to cut out the sternum, grind it up, and throw it in some protease for a day.  But I'm not sure if that would achieve the same thing they're claiming.

--Dan

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 5:28 PM Dan Kolis <dankolis@gmail.com> wrote:

Hmmm, that is a presumed corrective action for Arthritis.

Decades old, I dont know how legit it is...


Collagen rattling around inside the being is not necessarily the point, right ? Has to be in exactly the place mother nature needs it...

Still, sure maybe some utility in trying it ? Dunno....

Regs
Daniel B. Kolis




--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/2078b8bb-7db6-4840-9d9e-fe7f599f12b6n%40googlegroups.com.

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CAGjqrShzQjOJXjfo%2B%3DF7oNy5vvv7GtD9jsfDExF6%3DyCHdS5s6A%40mail.gmail.com.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

[DIYbio] Fish eating starch - Mybe a gain of Function thing


It's a sort of interesting conversation here.


If you want to make Species X munch on X' maybe there is a generic way to do that. Ex: seek genomic Germ line change so it can definitely benefit from eating it.

Then maybe a gain-of-function many generation corralled organisms to change the behaviours ?

This is basically, a huge, real science project.

Some lovers of spooky folklore would say: "Desire to eat it, is in the quiet ( not quite junk ) DNA and liberating it can't be too hard.

I think one way or the other, its a pretty big project generally. A more casual kick at the cat though might reveal some modality to move forward.

What eats what and gains from it, is essentially a nearly completely commercial question generally...

Regs
Daniel B. Kolis



--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/3bdc358c-6914-45e7-af9e-564bd3777d2cn%40googlegroups.com.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

[DIYbio] Casual use for Oxford type Sequencers for Methylation, especially

A general question I suppose...

Especially regarding use of these things:
https://nanoporetech.com/applications/dna-nanopore-sequencing


Here is a question or three:

This might accidentally be 'real science' but I'm more amped to ask it as a side-projecty urge.

For you'all that have pore sequencers all around, etc is is common ok etc to do your self for some quirky narrowly defined purpose ?

I mean, I visualise the lack of disposable materials to do an assay, especially is a game changer to using the thing. This is not like an Illumia with a $500 bucket of stuff to dispose of to use once...

Ex: I have read up a lot about Methylation and the hook right into Epigenetics.  Has anybody just done a self dump with the added  goop; ( Bisulphite ? ) and look to see a daily or weekly change due to lifestyle or some other environmental thing ?

a Base pair FASTQ of DNA is fine of 'real' DNA, sure but especially casual use for Epigenetics is the open question, like DIY bio sample, some little fooling and see even more sticking to it here and there... 'Just FOR FUN mostly'

Regards,
Daniel B. Kolis



--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/57615c8a-5a1a-46a8-94b2-6553809d9fc7n%40googlegroups.com.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

[DIYbio] Re: About bioinformatic, and fish eating starch

It's possible that my question was wrong. That the interesting thing isn't to find homologous genes to amylase from C. violaceus (tons, perhaps a majority, of all living organisms has amylase) but to find how many copies of the genes other fishes have? So how do one find fishes/organisms that have >2 copies of amylase or >2 copies of carboxyl ester lipase?


The thought of hacking gut bacteria to help predatory fish to eat a more herbivore diet is interesting. Also gives me an excuse to mention I have seen fry of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) die after being inoculated with ordinary intestinal bacteria. Making one think they could be sensitive to genetic engineered bacteria. But I'm sure that kind of dying of isn't that common.



fredag 17 mars 2023 kl. 13:19:15 UTC+1 skrev A. Ekergård:

Writing as someone who couldn't finish a very short online course in bioinformatic and as someone working with aquaculture. If I read the fish monkeyface prickleback (monkeyface prickleback) can break down starch, I should be able to open a database like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and find other fishes with the same genes for breaking down starch? Right? 


Hope I'm not looking too lazy for asking if anyone could help me? Hopefully it's not that complicated, but it's also not as easy as just writing: "what fishes produce amylase?"


Kind regards
Anders

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/426986b8-4596-4c94-bd94-bb5158c76030n%40googlegroups.com.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Re: [DIYbio] acetobacter xylinum??

My family was an original cultivator of Nata de Coco in the Philippines between the 50's into the late 70's. An aunt has either been holding the recipe/process hostage because of our family "story" about how the mother liquor and business was stolen from us OR she/the family truly didn't understand or know how to get the culture restarted and genuinely thought they lost it and couldn't start again. 


I'm in my myco and ancestral veneration journey, now being called to restart and reconnect with this process...

I'm filled with deep gratitude. Thank you all for helping me find this community, the open source of this information, and for connecting a large piece of my ancestral constellation. I'm excited to create the space in which I get to navigate this process.

Wonder what OP ended up creating!

On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 7:16:04 AM UTC-7 John MacBride wrote:
No problem...
https://plus.google.com/communities/116984929618483037920

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/e5551e40-0fc8-47e0-8af4-1e88af80eb85n%40googlegroups.com.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

[DIYbio] Re: About bioinformatic, and fish eating starch

It's a good thought, but my take would be that engineering single-cell organisms to utilize nutrients that they can't natively metabolize (what my PhD was focused on) is very different than engineering the same function into a complex multicellular organism.

It's more complicated that just changing the genome of the fish, you need the amylase expressed at the right level and in the right location - it's probably not gonna be very helpful in the brain.

I checked out the article - they very specifically talking about finding other non-carnivorous fish to use in aquaculture rather than trying to make carnivorous fish into vegetarians for essentially that reason.

If you want to make aquaculture more sustainable, I think you could try to identify the shortest/cheapest route from the starting carbon source (starch) to the food that a given fish normally eats. Not an ecologist so I could be wildly off here, but maybe you grow some microbes on the starch, them to some shrimp, then grind up the shrimp and feed that to the fish...

On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 3:07:15 AM UTC+7 A. Ekergård wrote:
I'm thankful for the help I got here. I tried to play with BLAST,  I didn't change any algorithm parameters, and got both European Peach (Perca fluviatilis) and zander (Sander lucioperca) quite high on the "result list". Both carnivores (both raised in aquaculture). Don't know what to do with that fact. It's close to hybris for me to start this threat , and one thing in life is that id you have a good idea, other people might have had the same idea before you. So for the record here's an article that mentions the same thought I had. https://news.uci.edu/2020/02/19/veggie-loving-fish-could-be-the-new-white-meat/: "Heras, the paper's first author. 'However, most aquaculture fish are carnivores and can't handle plant lipids. Sequencing this genome has provided us a better understanding of what types of genes are necessary for breaking down plant material. If we scan additional fish genomes, we may find omnivorous fish with the right genes that could provide new candidates for sustainable aquaculture.'"

onsdag 22 mars 2023 kl. 02:59:12 UTC+1 skrev Sean Sullivan:
I've thought a bunch about how much of a time-saver it would be for scientists to have the sort of natural language search of scientific knowledge that you are describing (there are a few LLM-type attempts at this underway but that's a different topic), but as far as I know it's not that simple.

Here's a couple things you can try (not exhaustive, this isn't really my expertise):

1. BRENDA database entry for amylase (https://www.brenda-enzymes.org/enzyme.php?ecno=3.2.1.1) has a section "Select one or more organisms in this record" - see if some fish scientific names are in the list.
2. UNIPROT database entry for amylase cross-referenced by its Enzyme Commission number (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb?query=ec:3.2.1.1) shows a list of organisms that have versions of the enzyme. A quick scan of the list shows at least one fish (Japanese Rice fish) in the list --> keep scrolling.
3. Take the DNA sequence of the amylase gene that you know and do a nucleotide blast search (Blastn - https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=MegaBlast&PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&BLAST_SPEC=). Paste the sequence in and search, it will pop up similar sequences it finds in different databases and will list the organisms the sequence came from.

These databases can be accessed programmatically via APIs if you know how to do that type of stuff. I hope you know lots of latin names...

Best,
Sean
On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 8:19:15 AM UTC-4 A. Ekergård wrote:

Writing as someone who couldn't finish a very short online course in bioinformatic and as someone working with aquaculture. If I read the fish monkeyface prickleback (monkeyface prickleback) can break down starch, I should be able to open a database like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and find other fishes with the same genes for breaking down starch? Right? 


Hope I'm not looking too lazy for asking if anyone could help me? Hopefully it's not that complicated, but it's also not as easy as just writing: "what fishes produce amylase?"


Kind regards
Anders

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/74c60885-3201-45a9-8f8f-0732b17ec78fn%40googlegroups.com.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

[DIYbio] Starch my fish; or is it fish out my starches ?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959440X16300811

Make a sub directory for each inquiry and ignore similarities of human nomenclature like names amylase-XXX just plow through each top down.

Good luck, I suppose. 


gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=MegaBlast&PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&BLAST_SPEC=). Paste the sequence in and search, it will pop up similar sequences it finds in different databases and will list the organisms the sequence came from.

These databases can be accessed programmatically via APIs if you know how to do that type of stuff. I hope you know lots of latin names...

Best,
Sean
On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 8:19:15 AM UTC-4 A. Ekergård wrote:

Writing as someone who couldn't finish a very short online course in bioinformatic and as someone working with aquaculture. If I read the fish monkeyface prickleback (monkeyface prickleback) can break down starch, I should be able to open a database like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and find other fishes with the same genes for breaking down starch? Right? 


Hope I'm not looking too lazy for asking if anyone could help me? Hopefully it's not that complicated, but it's also not as easy as just writing: "what fishes produce amylase?"


Kind regards
Anders

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/ec1c1c4d-0294-47f5-94c9-a7eaba9d26fcn%40googlegroups.com.

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CADZtRa%2BC%3DinLv%3DGQF1ygSXhXQA7Se4Zk2%3DKVVzzKp3FZkPnQrg%40mail.gmail.com.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

[DIYbio] Re: About bioinformatic, and fish eating starch

I'm thankful for the help I got here. I tried to play with BLAST,  I didn't change any algorithm parameters, and got both European Peach (Perca fluviatilis) and zander (Sander lucioperca) quite high on the "result list". Both carnivores (both raised in aquaculture). Don't know what to do with that fact. It's close to hybris for me to start this threat , and one thing in life is that id you have a good idea, other people might have had the same idea before you. So for the record here's an article that mentions the same thought I had. https://news.uci.edu/2020/02/19/veggie-loving-fish-could-be-the-new-white-meat/: "Heras, the paper's first author. 'However, most aquaculture fish are carnivores and can't handle plant lipids. Sequencing this genome has provided us a better understanding of what types of genes are necessary for breaking down plant material. If we scan additional fish genomes, we may find omnivorous fish with the right genes that could provide new candidates for sustainable aquaculture.'"

onsdag 22 mars 2023 kl. 02:59:12 UTC+1 skrev Sean Sullivan:
I've thought a bunch about how much of a time-saver it would be for scientists to have the sort of natural language search of scientific knowledge that you are describing (there are a few LLM-type attempts at this underway but that's a different topic), but as far as I know it's not that simple.

Here's a couple things you can try (not exhaustive, this isn't really my expertise):

1. BRENDA database entry for amylase (https://www.brenda-enzymes.org/enzyme.php?ecno=3.2.1.1) has a section "Select one or more organisms in this record" - see if some fish scientific names are in the list.
2. UNIPROT database entry for amylase cross-referenced by its Enzyme Commission number (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb?query=ec:3.2.1.1) shows a list of organisms that have versions of the enzyme. A quick scan of the list shows at least one fish (Japanese Rice fish) in the list --> keep scrolling.
3. Take the DNA sequence of the amylase gene that you know and do a nucleotide blast search (Blastn - https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=MegaBlast&PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&BLAST_SPEC=). Paste the sequence in and search, it will pop up similar sequences it finds in different databases and will list the organisms the sequence came from.

These databases can be accessed programmatically via APIs if you know how to do that type of stuff. I hope you know lots of latin names...

Best,
Sean
On Friday, March 17, 2023 at 8:19:15 AM UTC-4 A. Ekergård wrote:

Writing as someone who couldn't finish a very short online course in bioinformatic and as someone working with aquaculture. If I read the fish monkeyface prickleback (monkeyface prickleback) can break down starch, I should be able to open a database like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and find other fishes with the same genes for breaking down starch? Right? 


Hope I'm not looking too lazy for asking if anyone could help me? Hopefully it's not that complicated, but it's also not as easy as just writing: "what fishes produce amylase?"


Kind regards
Anders

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/ec1c1c4d-0294-47f5-94c9-a7eaba9d26fcn%40googlegroups.com.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS