@John good point...poor word choice on my part. Simon's solution is inexpensive, not cheap.
On Tuesday, March 6, 2012 3:13:22 PM UTC-5, John Griessen wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:53 PM, Chris Templeman wrote:--
> as your solution uses cheap microscopes slides why bother.
>
They're not "cheap", they're optically better and inexpensive.
:-)
Talk is cheap.
;-)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/diybio/-/_CFScj983kcJ.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
0 comments:
Post a Comment