Re: [DIYbio] New York Times - Arsenic in Our Chicken?

Your link doesn't work, it shows up as "http://goog_921276603/"

The article didn't specifically mention it helped the chickens, rather
that it made them /look/ healthy

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Simon Quellen Field <sfield@scitoys.com> wrote:
> Have you measured the arsenic levels in your blood?
> If you don't have high enough levels, perhaps you are not eating enough
> chicken. If the levels are higher than optimal, there are standard methods
> for fixing that. But even heavy metals gradually leave your body over time.
> We are, as the original article said, talking about levels that are so low
> that
> they have no medical effects on humans, but apparently have beneficial
> effect on chickens. You may have to eat your weight in chickens to get the
> same benefits.
>
> -----
> Get a free science project every week! "http://scitoys.com/newsletter.html"
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Jordan Miller <jrdnmlr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> does arsenic undergo biologic accumulation like I thought mercury
>> does? if so, this tends to accumulate more in species toward the top
>> of the food chain (e.g. humans) at higher and therefore more dangerous
>> concentrations.
>>
>> jordan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2012, at 11:45 PM, Nathan McCorkle <nmz787@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Simon Quellen Field
>> > <sfield@scitoys.com> wrote:
>> >> OK, so the levels of arsenic in the chicken were not enough to cause
>> >> any
>> >> health concerns, but were enough to reduce infections in the chickens.
>> >>
>> >> It sounds like we should all start adding small amounts of arsenic to
>> >> our
>> >> diets,
>> >> unless we get enough of it in our chicken.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Going on that:
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis#2004_Taiwan_cobalt-contaminated_steel
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Nathan McCorkle
>> > Rochester Institute of Technology
>> > College of Science, Biotechnology/Bioinformatics
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "DIYbio" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "DIYbio" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.

--
Nathan McCorkle
Rochester Institute of Technology
College of Science, Biotechnology/Bioinformatics

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment