i think that's true, similar to the Convention on Cluster Munitions treaty (adopted in 2008) although Libya used cluster munitions when it went into "scorched earth" mode in 2011. Some countries tend to follow treaties, until they feel like they don't have to, or want. "Non-binding".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi9hHDooAX4
On Thursday, May 3, 2012 11:50:28 PM UTC-4, Nathan McCorkle wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Daniel C. <dcrookston@gmail.com> wrote:--
> The US military did a lot of research into chemical and biological
> weapons. Their conclusion was that biological weapons are too
> unreliable and/or ineffective to actually use. Granted, part of the
> military's requirements probably include the ability to control the
> affected population (a goal that a terrorist might not share) but I
> still think it's a good sign. If the US military can't make it work,
> the chance that a bioterrorist will have success seems pretty slim.
>
I thought we don't have bioweapons because we agreed to some
international treaty(ies)
--
Nathan McCorkle
Rochester Institute of Technology
College of Science, Biotechnology/Bioinformatics
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/diybio/-/j48K4R63vz4J.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
0 comments:
Post a Comment