On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Jonathan Cline <jncline@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There are many other technologies that we use on a daily basis that are
>> comparatively lethal (automobiles, pharmaceuticals, etc) and generally
>> accepted.
>
> Those technologies are not possibly contagious. Or "against god's will."
Several fringe Christian denominations reject pharmaceuticals (and
medical intervention in general), preferring prayer instead. This
probably has something to do with why they're so small in number.
Somewhat relatedly, Dan Kaminsky tweeted a really nice analysis of the
recent H1N1 paper:
http://www.metafilter.com/115573/The-Avian-Flu-Transparency-vs-Public-Safety#4326172.
I particularly like this remark: "So if you were a bio-terrorist, and
all you cared about was making the virus deadly, and didn't care
anything about how it works, then all you'd have to do is buy some
ferrets and a sick chicken."
--mlp
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
Re: [DIYbio] Re: PBS: Downloadable Gun Parts, Personalized Bioterror: the Downside of Innovation
4:11 AM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment