Re: [DIYbio] Fwd: The institutionalization of OSHW

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Tim Schmidt <timschmidt@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've previously proposed using and extending, and have used in my own
> projects, Josef Prusa's ThingDoc. Which provides a perfectly workable
> minimum feature set for mapping dependencies, source files, and other
> softwareisms onto this physical world. It even provides for assembly
> steps and such. Is it perfect? Far from it. But the problem you
> mention has been solved. Time to move up to the next layer.

I am looking at the README. It claims only:

"""
* BoM text file
* HTML documentation
* TeX documentation
* Wiki documentation (suitable for the reprap.org wiki)
* Dependency tree in text-mode and using GraphViz
"""

Before I puke over this, can you show me where the documentation is?
is there a spec?

Does the BOM refer to part numbers, or package names, or what?

What is the dependency tree being resolved against?

The README links to a wiki, which 404s.

http://thingdoc.org/
https://github.com/prusajr/ThingDoc/wiki/

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.