On Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:58:18 PM UTC-7, matt harbowy wrote:
More importantly:With regard to comments regarding smaller-scale products development, EPA finds that,because smaller scale projects of limited use would most likely be exempt or involve a relativelylimited set of use and exposure scenarios, burdens due to regulatory review would be expected tobe minimal; thus, the impacts of greatest concern to smaller institutions or organizations could befrequently mitigated. In considering comments regarding CBI substantiation, EPA has decided notto require up-front CBI substantiation in connection with TERA submissions.
Also, that document is specifically about the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), which only applies to microorganisms intended for commercial purposes.
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:29:10 PM UTC-7, SC wrote:
For reference, the official EPA word on regulation of GMO microorganisms:Stacy
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/3402a3d9-58c7-4503-a5c8-4c965bb951b8%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
0 comments:
Post a Comment