More importantly:
With regard to comments regarding smaller-scale products development, EPA finds that,
because smaller scale projects of limited use would most likely be exempt or involve a relatively
limited set of use and exposure scenarios, burdens due to regulatory review would be expected to
be minimal; thus, the impacts of greatest concern to smaller institutions or organizations could be
frequently mitigated. In considering comments regarding CBI substantiation, EPA has decided not
to require up-front CBI substantiation in connection with TERA submissions.
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:29:10 PM UTC-7, SC wrote:
For reference, the official EPA word on regulation of GMO microorganisms:Stacy
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/554ec2d1-0eb1-44fa-b1dd-d4b5d6aea2c2%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
0 comments:
Post a Comment