Whether or not memberships are a good idea isn't my point, rather that a system requiring them is indicative of a system entirely unlike communism.
Shouldn't take that as an endorsement of Communism on my part. Doesn't seem to work any better than Capitalism as a viable way to build long-lived societies.
Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cathal Garvey (Android)
<cathalgarvey@cathalgarvey.me> wrote:What a bizarre attack. Biocurious isn't 'communist', it's a 'commons'. And
it was never meant to run on 'flower power', it was meant to run on money
like a good little capitalist commons.
Just because there were membership fees doesn't mean that membership
fees are a good idea. I don't see your point.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment