Re: [DIYbio] Seeking Open Source Licence for new biotech method

Thanks, John,

Folks, How does the patent-and-place-in-trust method compare with placing the concept in the public domain, so no-one can patent it, by publishing it publicly without any patenting attempts?

Brian


From: John Griessen <john@industromatic.com>
To: diybio@googlegroups.com
Cc: Brian Cady <briancady413@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [DIYbio] Seeking Open Source Licence for new biotech method

On 09/16/2013 01:42 PM, Brian Cady wrote:
> I'm patenting a genetic engineering method so that I can make it freely available through an open source licence. Does anyone know
> of good open source licences for intellectual property, so that this concept, and any others that use it, will remain in the
> commons, available to all?

No.  The way to lock it open is to hire a good, yet oddball patent attorney to help you decide
how to make claims, patent them, then assign the rights to a trust-fund-like foundation to manage
in perpetuity for benefit of ______, and you fill in "__for_everyone___", and hand it over to them
forever.  IP is still old fashioned -- like battling dinosaurs.  Leaving something for everyone
to benefit from is so foreign, some attorneys have difficulty with the language and misunderstand it
until spelled out.



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment