Re: [DIYbio] Barcoding of wheat



On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 11:49:18 AM UTC-7, Patrik D'haeseleer wrote:
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:55:45 AM UTC-7, Simon Field wrote:

Measuring mineral content such as arsenic might tell you about groundwater depletion as a result of agriculture, or changes in local heavy metal concentration as a result of local mining and smelting.

I wonder if it's possible to tell something about fertilization practices by looking at nitrogen isotopes. 15N/14N ratio tends to increase with trophic level, so you may be able to see a slight increase in 15N in plants fertilized with human feces, vs animal dung, vs unfertilized crops.

Aha - let me just answer my own question... Here's a Plos One paper talking about nitrogen isotope ratios in plants, and fertilization sources:

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0053763
"The second potentially significant source-related cause of plant δ15N variation is the uptake of fertilizer-derived N by plants. Animal fertilizers are characterized by extremely variable δ15N values depending on the relative proportions of N-bearing species in the fertilizer (e.g. urea, uric acid, ammonium, organic matter) [143]. Manures consisting primarily of solid waste derived from terrestrial herbivores tend to have δ15N values between 2 and 8 ‰ [144], while those that contain a mix of solid and liquid waste (slurry fertilizers) tend to have higher δ15N values, often between 6 and 15 ‰ [145], [146]. The highest δ15N values for animal fertilizers (>25 ‰) have been recorded for seabird guano [143], [147], which consists primarily of uric acid and is subject to significant NH4+ volatilization. The addition of animal fertilizer N to the soil therefore adds an N source with an isotopic composition that is usually enriched in 15N relative to endogenous soil N. This results in higher δ15N values for plants growing in soils fertilized with animal waste than those plants growing in unfertilized soil or soils fertilized with chemical fertilizers [143], [145][147]."

You might be able to identify some potential collaborators with the expertise and resources to do this kind of analysis, by tracking down those references...

Patrik

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/250dc420-827a-4e9d-b4f4-11cdff0a9b95%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment