Btw, Krichevsky's paper states that his (first batch of) bioluminescent plants did not grow slower than the control group (perhaps they did, but less than say 5% slower).
Say the new enhanced version takes twice the amount of energy - growing 10% slower. Or even 20% slower. Still, enough energy to grow. If you could make it inducible by darkness, you would cut metabolic energy bill by half.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/a9ff55ea-51b4-47ea-90ed-2d77d3d1747d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment