Hi Jarrad,
Thanks for raising this urgent topic again. Last month we had a great meeting on this topic at the Pixelache festival in Helsinki.
I recommend you to read some of the articles in the package that Rudiger assembled in preparation of this:
bioartsociety.fi/archives/2518
It includes the BIOFAB 3.0 report, which is quite open on the ownership issues they were facing.
Also Deibel's article on Open Genetic Code is also a good starting point for you.
Pieter
On Monday, 7 July 2014 05:52:32 UTC+2, Jarrad wrote:
Hey Guys,
There seems to be alot of interest around open science and how to go about that,
Has anyone looked at Creative Commons (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/) or Open source licenses such as Apache 2.0, MIT, GPL
Has anyone thought about creating a more specific license for biology (sequences/protocols/etc) ?
For example it's unclear what license/terms the parts in iGEM use http://parts.igem.org
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/4c864ff5-ff75-484d-bcdf-7aa8c29e808e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment