Re: [DIYbio] Re: Chemical Calligraphy

great work,

saw this scientific art for the first time.

I hope this can be used in future as dictionary for writing secret codes .

Thanks for sharing 

On Sunday, July 20, 2014 5:38:05 PM UTC+5:30, Matthew DeBlock wrote:

CHEMICAL CALLIGRAPHY

http://dscript.org/chem.pdf

This is a mnemonic device and art form.

It is designed to allow simpler representation of bio-chem molecules with "less noise".

It drops some information, which is assumed is "obvious" to someone with basic chemistry knowledge. The missing information can usually be "filled in" with basic chemistry understanding.

It allows various forms of any one molecule (the larger the molecule the more possible forms), which adds greatly to the users ability to make artistic and aesthetic choices without altering the molecular and structural information.


Also new...
CSCRIPT - Computer / Human Bi-Friendly Writing System

http://dscript.ca/cscript.pdf

Cscript is designed to be both easy to read and write by humans as well as be digitally and programmatically read and written by computers.

There is of course a trade off between the two. Cscript could e thought of as "lying somewhere between QR codes and standard hand writing"

For Humans it easy to produce with standard lined paper and allows some intuitive "cursive" elements.

For Computers it removes entirely the need for glyph recognition and shape/vector analysis. It could read straight off the raster level as a string absolute values. It eliminates the need for an entire level of OCR shape comparison, and drastically reduces ambiguity, requires FAR less processing power and increasing accuracy.

It is not meant to be "perfect" for either, but instead offer a more balanced alternative.

**technically it would not be considered "OCR" as it does not actually require the "character recognition" level of the software at all.

***keep in mind the "value range zones" can even be flexible based on context (ie. assume top=1, bottom=0.. [0->0.33]=0, [0.34->0.66]=1, [0.67->1]=2... the values [0 , 0.1, 0.1] = "0-1-1" because there would be no corner point in 000




Still have not rebuilt my lab, current apt too small :( So still just hacking with "pen and paper" ;)

Hopefully soon will be able to get back to my mad science  :)

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/diybio/hZxz-UHgWDI/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/e9c2133e-3c96-474c-a5cc-2c29106b8702%40googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.