200 cycles probably won't work because you will have a really poor signal/noise ratio. It would be better to do a 20 cycle reaction, take about 1 uL of this 1st reaction and run another 20 cycle reaction (still going to be getting more noise, but it shouldn't be as bad as 200 cycles in a row).
On Friday, October 10, 2014 6:12:14 PM UTC-7, Josiah Zayner wrote:
-- On Friday, October 10, 2014 6:12:14 PM UTC-7, Josiah Zayner wrote:
Thanks.Yeah, thanks Nathan. Was trying to do something a little more accessible than polyacrylamide. I mean that should totally work though. I was going to order a sequencing kit but instead decided that I might want something a little different and be able to tune my ddNTPs and such so I ordered the chemicals. This is because I think one will probably need more DNA and so instead of doing a cycle sequencing reaction of 20 cycles maybe 200 cycles(it is linear instead of exponential)?We will see. I think this requires experimentation. I think too many people think, "Oh I can just go sequence this for $3." so no one has really looked much into this avenue or rather published on it. If you have any tips or ideas send them my way.On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Nathan McCorkle <nmz...@gmail.com> wrote:I've read up on this before, and even wrote up a wiki page on how I'd go about accomplishing a mini-sequencing-gel... but the basic idea was that a dye like gelRed had pretty good sensitivity, and this is based on the total number of bases available for intercalation/association.--So you start your sanger sequencing reaction with lots and lots of primer, such that each pool of amplicons is very dense, and since these co-locate during electrophoresis, you'd get a nice bright signal.Here's the paper I was basing the general electrophoresis protocol off of, but I'd decided to try polyacrylamide since I was looking for nice-looking gel images:I ordered a sanger sequencing kit and got the polyacrylamide, but then got busy or something (and I don't have much biohacking community around for these projects to progress without my full commitment).... so I never tested it.The basic math I did for the required starting primer concentration to get high enough signal density was:nanograms_DNA_in_band = (formula_weight_of_nucleotide * length_of_DNA_in_band) * (concentration_of_limiting_reagent * microliters_of_ reagent_added / num_microliters_in_liter) / num_bands_expected * num_nanograms_in_gramnanograms_DNA_in_band needs to be larger than the dye's datasheet specs for minimum sensitivity.On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Josiah Zayner <josiah...@gmail.com> wrote:So at Science Hack Day SF I worked with a bunch of people to attempt to perform DIY DNA sequencing without any expensive equipment or toxic chemicals.--
We were not able to visualize the sequencing reactions yet(don't know if they worked). However, we were able to achieve ~1-2 nucleobase resolution in a 10% agarose gel.
Here is a blog post about it: http://doitourselfscience.blogspot.com/2014/10/science- hack-day-sf-2014-diy-dna.html
Hopefully in the next few months I plan to continue the work at Biocurious.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio .
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/d7e85a5d-0a1b- .4578-b468-9cbe16afeddd% 40googlegroups.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--
-Nathan
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/diybio/_nRPCLUpsxc/ .unsubscribe
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio .
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CA%2B82U9L7RLC- .FKsCHUMBLddxw%2B- wsya27EA973YfBRUpMThakg% 40mail.gmail.com
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/e945fd8b-1f48-4c4a-9bd3-54da4f78eb34%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.






0 comments:
Post a Comment