De novo is harder and more costly than resequencing, but not AFAIK by a factor of ten. So it seems Cory may be close to the mark, but the actual cost becomes person-hours, because de-novo certainly requires more *work*, and that's before you discuss assembly.
Nanopore may be just the ticket: extremely long, fast reads potentially in the field. Perfect for low-pass firehose sequence generation.
On 20 November 2014 16:16:27 GMT+00:00, "Mega [Andreas Stuermer]" <masterstorm123@gmail.com> wrote:
Sequencing won't be that low for de novo sequencing of species I guess (?)
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment