As a co-creator of the Bio-Commons project I agree that a thoroughly discussion is needed.
Also we might want to take inspiration and share law analysis that are happening in the digital fabrication field.
There, a very deep discussion is happening on developing new types of licences that are meant to protect the intellectual assets while guaranteeing the commoning of production.
It's a very broad topic with many issue to be nailed down, however I see a growing interest raising up around this discussion and in the near future I guess many will jump in it by providing their points of view, approaches and eventually solutions.
Cheers
Eugenio Battaglia
On Monday, 15 December 2014 15:28:54 UTC+1, Ruediger Trojok wrote:
-- Also we might want to take inspiration and share law analysis that are happening in the digital fabrication field.
There, a very deep discussion is happening on developing new types of licences that are meant to protect the intellectual assets while guaranteeing the commoning of production.
It's a very broad topic with many issue to be nailed down, however I see a growing interest raising up around this discussion and in the near future I guess many will jump in it by providing their points of view, approaches and eventually solutions.
Cheers
Eugenio Battaglia
On Monday, 15 December 2014 15:28:54 UTC+1, Ruediger Trojok wrote:
Hey everyone
thanks for commenting. i am sorry for not responding to the discussion.
I tried publishing in O'reilly Biocoder, but they couldnt fit the whitepaper concept into their format ...
The question is too complex though for lossless compression into old school publication types
and with new internet communication i do not see the reason for that, either.
Anyway, I was quite busy on developing the project behind the scenes.
Early next year i will launch a new website with a dedicated track for the biocommons discussion.
All your critique and points will be taken up into that.
Please stay tuned.
Best,
Rüdiger
Am Samstag, 23. August 2014 03:25:34 UTC+2 schrieb Jonathan Cline:Hundreds of software dudes working really hard on linux for the past 20 years created a system which allowed Google and Samsung to step in and reap gazillions of dollars selling android cell phones, or IBM to step in and reap gazillions of dollars selling services, while the original software dudes get nada, regardless of license, even though linux uses a harmful viral license.
Hundreds of iGem students working really hard on synbio prototypical projects for the past several years created scientific or business ideas which allowed overs to step in and reap funding or startups directly related to or verbatim copied from these ideas while the original students get nada.
## Jonathan Cline
## jcl...@ieee.org
## Mobile: +1-805-617-0223
########################
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/92eeb3a7-89f3-4e77-adc5-33a834c7f333%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment