On 04/16/2015 02:38 PM, Jeff Backstrom wrote:
> see whether the sample needs to be heated more or less than the control in order to maintain ~37C or whatever.
>
This strike me as the finding of the "most sensitive" sweet spot of the reaction.
Sounds like a good approach with such tiny heat flows to detect....
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/5530553A.2060802%40industromatic.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [DIYbio] Isothermal microcalorimetry for bacterial activity.
5:35 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment