On 02/13/2016 09:26 AM, Simon Quellen Field wrote:
> make it easier for the public to challenge patents that are too broad, or that aren't actually innovation. The current system
> defines prior art as prior patents, largely because the patent office does not have the resources to (or the help from the public)
> to do a better job. If the patent office could insist that there was enough information in the patent to reproduce the work, that
> would bring us back the main benefit of the system.
+1, and I think the term of 20 years is too long and the prices for the process are too high, especially since the process is
guarded/led/gate-kept by the consultants that live off the fees.
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/56BFCDE6.7030902%40industromatic.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[DIYbio] patents (was: Mosquito)
4:44 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment