On Feb 11, 2016 8:20 AM, "Gabriela Sanchez" <sab.gaby@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So, the main argument against this would be Github.
> But do you think that git would be better than a wiki? I think it is useful to keep track of what changes and who is changing what.
I use github pages, I wrote a mini markup to html converter since I felt Jekyll and similars were still too heavy or involved too much setup.
http://nmz787.github.io/html/about_this_blog.html
I like that it is free, I am not depend on their closed source voodoo since I've got my local git repo... If they ever pull the free plug, I'll just upload my HTML files elsewhere, it should be easy since they're all static.
That said, since I wrote the main entries in markdown, it basically feels like a wiki with git for editing. A mediawiki install would feel a lot nicer for 'normal' scientists.
---- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CA%2B82U9Jw__5G7sG14sr8FXqJDmp7Z%2Bu1iCNcQL_Su6Fi7FGDpg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment