Re: [DIYbio] Rise of the Scientrepreneur ...

biased towards cancer-related research:

http://davidrasnick.com/Home_files/Begley%202012.pdf

6/53 (11%) studies were able to be reproduced by amgen scientists.

and editorial note in nature:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v485/n7396/full/485041e.html



On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:21 PM, ruphos <apokruphos@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:18 PM, drllau <drlawrencelau@gmail.com> wrote:
given that 50% of published scientific results are in error

Citation please.


--
"And if ye cannot be saints of knowledge, then be at least its warriors."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment