I've read the article, which seems like a balanced opinion on the state of synthetic biology development, that doesn't really say anything crazy. You'll have to be more specific. "The Principles for the Oversight of SB" is a large document (TLDR), which I'm guessing contains a lot of ideas already implemented in government policies. If you are talking about US policies, please specify US.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Jo <johanyjohn@yahoo.com> wrote:
I just wanted to share with this group what I have read right now on New Scientist. You can find the article here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428684.800-lets-get-real-on-synthetic-biology.html
Please make sure to read the "The Principles for the Oversight of Synthetic Biology." If this stuff gets implemented, we would all be affected.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/diybio/-/3kXbWYbdIVAJ.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
--
met vriendelijke groet,
Jelmer Cnossen
tel: 0648709790
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
0 comments:
Post a Comment