Yeah, Wikipedia seems pretty hopeless if you have someone willing to fight for their position, and it's generally just not worth the pain to try to sway things in your direction. About the best you can do is to cause your "edit war" to get the attention of other editors which might result in some sort of compromise, but there's no guarantee that things will work out in the direction of "truth", let alone your own definition of the word :)
Here's a link to current and planned studies related to Lyme Disease, including those currently recruiting volunteers if you're so inclined.
I did some more reading on the subject, and it sounds like the standard two-step test should really be at least 85% accurate in anyone who has been infected for any extended period of time. If you're not showing positive on these tests then my advice (which is worth nothing) is to consider carefully whether those results might be correct.
G.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/diybio/-/NDjAme6FSoEJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
0 comments:
Post a Comment