On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Cathal Garvey
<cathalgarvey@cathalgarvey.me> wrote:
> Aaron Swartz's case makes it pretty clear that even distributing
> out-of-copyright papers is grounds for ruinous copyright litigation.
> Yay knowledge.
Are you referring to his work on PACER? Although the FBI made him the
subject of an active investigation, there were no charges brought
against him from his PACER downloads. There was also no resulting
copyright litigation. As for his work on JSTOR, regardless of the
charges there was no distribution of content from his machine, so I am
not sure why you would cite that either...
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [DIYbio] legality of distributing pdfs or hard copy papers?
12:32 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment