You definitely have my support in developing this! Even though I will have to keep the parts separate in my fridge for a long time to come, I look forward to the day that we are finally allowed to perform a transformation. When that happens, I can't imagine a better experiment than this one.
Everyone involved in DIYBio knows that Cathal is one of the brightest minds in the community. No doubt on my mind that this project has all the right values, motivations and hopefully set a new standard for open biotech.
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 04:11:01 UTC+1, Patrik D'haeseleer wrote:
-- Everyone involved in DIYBio knows that Cathal is one of the brightest minds in the community. No doubt on my mind that this project has all the right values, motivations and hopefully set a new standard for open biotech.
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 04:11:01 UTC+1, Patrik D'haeseleer wrote:
In some cases, the immunity protein *is* the transporter. So the ideal case would be to have a small peptide bacteriocin, plus a transporter to provide immunity and secrete the bacteriocin. That may be wishful thinking though ;-)
I'm sure cathal will let us know in good time exactly which bacteriocin he's aiming for - there's quite a few to choose from. I'm assuming some sort of microcin. Those can get as small as a dozen amino acids or less, but most actually require some additional maturation proteins as well.
Meanwhile, there's a bunch of good online resources to explore, including BACTIBASE.
Patrik
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 6:44:05 PM UTC-8, Koeng wrote:Out of curiosity, how big is the operon/ transport protein?Perhaps another hack would be fusing an enzyme to the bacteriocin.... then get it exported
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:33:23 PM UTC-8, Cathal Garvey wrote:Yep! This has been on my to-do for a long time, actually, but most
bacteriocins are far too large to be carried on a practical cloning
plasmid. Operons run into many kilobases. It just so happens that in
E.coli, there are quite a few very small bacteriocin operons..
In fact, several of them are so small that the primary contribution to
operon length isn't the bacteriocin synthesis cluster, but the
*transporters* to get the bacteriocin outside the cell! Gram negatives
have two membranes, so while Gram+ cells can use generalised export
systems like "sec", E.coli has *no* unified export machinery beyond the
periplasm, and each gene cluster that exports a product has to encode
its own transporter. As it happens, they're all massive!
If everything works *too* well and I have money left over for further
improvement, I've got a speculative method in mind that could
potentially reduce the operon for the bacteriocin to less than ~300bp,
by trying to leverage E.coli's sec system and hack things so the
proteins escape the periplasm anyway.. We'll see how successful the
project is on IndieGoGo before I get ahead of myself! :) But, a 300bp
selection cassette would be a nice hack, I think!
On 23/01/14 01:27, Patrik D'haeseleer wrote:
> Ah - now I remember!
>
> For the uninitiated, here's an earlier post by Cathal on using bacteriocins:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/diybio/_yCzEK8P6Sk/ jCGdYDJeM74J
>
> "Much better to focus on antibiotics that are too impractical to use in
> humans anyway; bacteriocins look like a great option here. They are
> protein-based, so they can't be taken as a tablet and they stimulate too
> much immunity to be injected, so most of them are entirely useless for
> human therapy. However, they can be pretty lethal against the specific
> species and strains they affect. Further, the mechanisms of resistance
> to these antibiotics are often evasive rather than degradative.
>
> That is, while bacteria destroy ampicillin, allowing non-transformed or
> plasmid-loss cells to survive alongside them, most bacteriocin
> resistance systems merely protect individual cells against the
> bacteriocin, without destroying it. This allows for longer culturing
> times for transformed cells before plasmid loss becomes an issue, and
> might even protect cultures from late-growth contamination.
>
> With bacteriocins, you could even have your transformed cells *make* the
> antibiotic, leaving the job of killing untransformed cells to the
> transformed cells. That reduces your necessary ingredients from three
> (bacteria, DNA, antibiotic) to two: bacteria, and DNA."
> Patrik
>
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:51:46 PM UTC-8, Cathal Garvey wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Patrik!
>>
>> The details aren't gonna be NDA'd, but I am gonna parcel them out to
>> supporters first. ;) They can percolate outwards from there if ye like,
>> I just want to be honest about the "inside perspective" part of the
>> lowest-tier perk.
>>
>> I will debunk myths about auxotrophy though before they snowball! No,
>> this won't require auxotrophy or specialised media or strains, it should
>> work in most E.coli strains. It's bacteriocin-based.
>>
>> On 22/01/14 23:48, Patrik D'haeseleer wrote:
>>> Auxotrophic strain? C'mon - you can give us a little hint at least...
>>>
>>> Funded!
>>>
>>> Patrik
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:48:31 PM UTC-8, Cathal Garvey wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Of course! Full details will be forthcoming as the project develops and
>>>> it'll be fully open source, though I'm gonna keep most of the juicy
>> design
>>>> details for supporters at first: it's part of the first perk, after
>> all. :)
>>>>
>>>> Koeng <koen...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "IndieBB is further designed to do most of the work normally left up
>> to
>>>>> you, most importantly the process of antibiotic selection"
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we have any information on the self selection method? :D
>>>>> Also I sent the page to everyone i think would be interested. Great
>> job
>>>>> with the kit!
>>>>>
>>>>> -Koeng
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:01:00 PM UTC-8, Cathal Garvey wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>> As anyone on this list for more than a month can attest, our most
>> common
>>>>>> FAQ here is "How do I get started?". More often than not, it's more
>>>>>> specifically "How do I get started in synthetic biology?", and our
>>>>>> answers can get a bit woolly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The truth is that our options for beginners all suck. Most suppliers
>> are
>>>>>> hostile towards independent buyers, so we tell new people to buy the
>>>>>> "refill kit" from Carolina and pretend to be a school, or we mail
>>>>>> plasmids of dubious provenance to one another. While that's good for
>>>>>> community spirit, it says a lot that we celebrate knowing the
>>>>>> approximate sequence of one of them at last.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, we've talked a lot about the issue of getting, using and
>>>>>> disposing of antibiotics for this purpose a lot, and we've talked
>> more
>>>>>> and more recently about removing the need for antibiotics altogether.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's what I aim to do, and I'd really appreciate your help and
>> support
>>>>>> making it happen. Here's my IndieGoGo campaign, freshly pressed:
>>>>>> http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/indiebb-your-first- gmo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The kit is designed for beginners, and for teachers and education
>>>>>> groups, to introduce people to the methods of E.coli engineering.
>> It's
>>>>>> also designed to be hackable and to be fairly licensed in an Open
>> Source
>>>>>> way that preserves the user's freedoms going forward. It's fairly
>>>>>> priced, and designed by and for DIYbioers. It'll be fluorescent, and
>> it
>>>>>> won't need antibiotics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you're interested, please help me out and support the IndieGoGo
>>>>>> campaign. It's an all-or-nothing campaign, so if I don't hit the
>> goal,
>>>>>> nothing is raised. If you know a bio/hacker, educator or student
>> who'd
>>>>>> be interested, please let them know, too. And if you're on Twitter or
>>>>>> (ugh) Facebook, a shoutout to let others know would be really, really
>>>>>> appreciated. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the purposes of fundraising and separating my usual noise from
>> the
>>>>>> campaign, I've started a new twitter account for this, too:
>> @IndieBBDNA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gratefully yours, and looking forward to collaborating on this and
>>>>>> making it real!
>>>>>> Cathal
>>>>>> PS: As I know too well, nothing can be guaranteed to work in Synbio
>> at
>>>>>> this point, so bear that in mind. However, this is the most
>> conservative
>>>>>> design I've yet embarked on, and I'm confident it will work. So, bear
>>>>>> that in mind too. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/505698f6-9ded-4706-8d8e-183969e1ec54%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.






0 comments:
Post a Comment